?

Log in

No account? Create an account
recent stories superwonderfulous peoples pick a day, any day! who, me? go back in time! go back in time! move boldly ahead! move boldly ahead!
It's a mad mad mad mad mad mad mad cow world - Ldy, the lemony, ligerish ducttaparian's Magic Treehouse of Lost Thoughts
A classy broad's life... with footnotes.
ldy
ldy
It's a mad mad mad mad mad mad mad cow world
Glad we caught it. It was, after all, only a matter of time.

Don't mind me. I just get mad that we've been testing so few cattle for what could be a nasty epidemic a dozen or more years from now. vCJD (the human version of mad cow) and other TSEs and prion diseases are nothing to sneeze at. These are diseases we can neither cure nor control, and do not even understand all that well. Eating BSE-infected meat is just one possible cause-- I bet there are others. And incubation could be one year or thirty-- we just don't know.

Awful way to die, too.

You'd think the CDC would require that all cases of vCJD and CJD be reported.

But no. They don't.

In fact, studies suggest that it's often misdiagnosed as Alzheimers, Huntington disease, or early-onset dementia.

Perhaps if we ignore it, it will go away. La la la la, we can't hear you, CJD.

When you think about the fact that we slaughter nearly 40 million cattle each year, but tested only 20,000 last year (a huge increase over the 5,000 tested the prior year, and the 1,000 the year before that)-- well, it's no wonder we've been "BSE free" for so long. Can't find what you don't look for. And the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Food and Drug Administration considers this to be "an aggressive surveillance program."

Yet that 20,000 does not even represent a tenth of downer cows (cows that are not ambulatory at time of slaughter).

(As an aside, yes, at least 200,000 cows last year were too sick to stand. This situation is improving, but we may be a day late and a dollar short.)

According to Agriculture Secretary Ann Veneman, this testing program of ours "far exceeds international testing standards."

Funny how we pick and choose our "international testing standards."

We don't say that we're not at all meeting the bare minimum of testing recommended by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, which suggests that every downer cow be screened for the disease, as well as healthy animals at random.

No, we say that we're exceeding the standards set by the Office International des Epizooties, which suggests that if you don't have a known case of it, you shouldn't really have to test for it.

La la la laaaa, we still can't hear you.

Psst-- open one eye. Has it gone away yet?

Pisses me off, it does. Do you know that a variant is widespread in deer and elk, nationwide?

And it's still perfectly legal in this country to render elk and deer with that variant (Chronic Wasting Disease) and feed it to other animals.

I'm no Chicken Little, mind you, but I think we may be in for a rough ride.

Here's hoping I'm very wrong.

I'd rather eat my words right now than meat.

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

Anywho, other than that, things are going well in my little world. :)

I've got to go pack or sleep or something-- cab will be here at 6:40a, and I am, as usual, underprepared.

I hope each and every one of you has a lovely holiday (and if you don't celebrate, have a fantabulous weekend).

See you on the flip side, folks!

*smoooooooooooooooooch*

I'm feeling all kinds of: tired tired
What I hear: fans fanning

10 tall tales or Tell me a story
Comments
From: zztzed Date: December 23rd, 2003 09:50 pm (UTC) (permalink)
It's not unreasonable of me to be scared shitless about this, is it?
ldy From: ldy Date: December 23rd, 2003 09:59 pm (UTC) (permalink)
I don't think it's particularly reasonable to be scared shitless of anything.

But a little healthy caution couldn't hurt. :)

From: zztzed Date: December 23rd, 2003 10:23 pm (UTC) (permalink)
You know me; I either fear irrationally or not at all. :P
duinlas From: duinlas Date: December 24th, 2003 06:48 am (UTC) (permalink)
look on the bright side. You could be dead already.
gamethyme From: gamethyme Date: December 23rd, 2003 09:52 pm (UTC) (permalink)
There is a bit more info here.
From: godblossom Date: December 24th, 2003 03:07 am (UTC) (permalink)

mad cow writes...

Mad cow scares me a bit. I lived in the UK from 1989 til 1994 (prime mad cow years apparently) and now blood banks won't take my blood, saying it might be tainted. o__0 I feel a bit like a time bomb.
duinlas From: duinlas Date: December 24th, 2003 06:49 am (UTC) (permalink)
eh. if they'd stop feeding cows dead and mulched cows/deer/whatever this would be less bad.

THat's the REAL problem here, and how it spreads. It's not liek they get it from touching each other.

And they keep saying you can only get it from eating the nervous tissue of a cow (ie: brains, but I would guess nerve endings too)

vanilla_christ From: vanilla_christ Date: December 24th, 2003 07:46 am (UTC) (permalink)
On the up-side, this little scare is definitely going to force the beef industry to shape up it's operations and run a tighter ship. Especially if we lose those export contracts altogether... money talks, after all.

Down side, if all those export contracts are put on long-term hold, that's gonna drive up the price of beef.

Well, looks like it's ham and chicken for me.
curiouscat2 From: curiouscat2 Date: December 25th, 2003 11:16 am (UTC) (permalink)

A Beef with a good history

Check out Kobe Beef as an alternative.
I worked at a Health Food store in Winter Park, and it was a top selling item.
I know, I was vegan and I have to deal with friends who think a vegan life is, well taxing to say the least.
A favorite site for more info & facts is:
vegansource
From: luker Date: December 25th, 2003 08:27 pm (UTC) (permalink)
boy it sure is a good thing that people don't over-react to a single incident and ban all beef exports from the U.S. That would be very un-neighbourly :)
10 tall tales or Tell me a story